EXPERTISE
Ewing Law acts for the defence in all high-profile, serious and complex criminal cases on a private funded basis. These include but are not limited to allegations of fraud, offences under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and other serious financial crimes (aka white collar crime) and Serious Crime (e.g. murder, drug importation, blackmail, sexual assaults, robbery).
In addition we accept private instruction in respect of any proceedings before the criminal courts, including motoring offences, offences before the Magistrates Courts, allegations of General Crime before the Crown Court, cash forfeiture, and prosecutions by non-CPS agencies such as HM Revenue and Customs, the Serious Fraud Office, the Trading Standards Agency and the various environmental crime agencies.
We frequently appear before professional disciplinary bodies – including but not limited to sporting bodies and panels regulating the medical professions – on behalf of private clients accused of compliance or regulatory breach.

We also offer expertise and advice to private clients, companies and institutions in respect of any proposed professional conduct and its compliance with any relevant governing regulation.
For more information on any specific area of expertise, please click the link below:

Serious & Complex Crimes Defence

Frequently instructed to defend in major, nationally reported criminal trials, Ewing Law is a recognised leader when it comes to serious/complex crime.

With the experience and expertise to deliver in even the most serious, complex and high profile of criminal cases, our practice ranges from murder to large scale drug conspiracies, and from kidnap, blackmail and armed robberies to allegations of a sexual nature, particularly those within the media and sporting sectors. In addition we have a particular and much sought after expertise in the fields of corruption, bribery and money laundering.

With decades of experience to call upon, our team members have been instructed to defend in cases brought by all of the major UK prosecuting bodies, including but not limited to the Crown Prosecution Service, CPS Special Case Work Unit, National Crime Agency, Serious Fraud Office, HMRC, Insolvency Service, Health and Safety Executive, Department of Work and Pensions, Financial Conduct Authority and more. This wealth of experience makes Ewing Law the logical choice for any individual or company subject to investigation by any prosecuting body within the United Kingdom.

We are regularly instructed to defend nationwide, with our reputation in this area of law taking us from London to Newcastle and everywhere in between. In addition, our team members in recent times have worked internationally in states such as Spain, Malaysia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Portugal, Cyprus, Ireland, China, Barbados, Philippines and Hong Kong.

EXAMPLES OF THE CASES IN WHICH MEMBERS OF THE EWING LAW TEAM HAVE TAKEN A LEAD ROLE INCLUDE
R. v. J.
Acted for a defendant alleged to have been a key part of a conspiracy to gain late-night entry to bank cash machines via the use of explosive gas.
BLACKFRIARS CROWN COURT
R. v. T.
Acted the first defendant alleged to have led a conspiracy to disguise high-end vehicles stolen from overseas, to allow for their ‘legal’ resale in the UK.
KINGSTON CROWN COURT
R. v. M.
Acted alone for one of 16 defendants alleged to have together controlled the two largest brothels in the North of England. These proceedings never made it to trial, following a successful three-week abuse of process argument that resulted in the judge ruling that it would be ‘unfair to try’ the defendants in light of the previous conduct of the police.
SHEFFIELD CROWN COURT
R. v. C.
Defended in a multi-handed trial alleging a major conspiracy to smuggle both tobacco and alcohol.
CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT
R. v. W.
Acted for one defendant in a multi-handed trial arising from an allegation of conspiracy to import in excess of 2 tonnes of cannabis.
WEYMOUTH CROWN COURT
R. v. N.
Represented one defendant in a multi-handed trial arising from the alleged importation of 5 tonnes of cannabis, complicated by competing prosecuting bodies brought about by a parallel allegation of conspiracy to produce false travel documents (passports).
SOUTHAMPTON CROWN COURT

White Collar Crime Defence

Ewing Law is recognised as one of the leading defence firms in the field of white collar crime. With practically every member of the core team having specialised in defending the most complex allegations, together they possess unrivalled experience in every variation of white collar crime, including boiler-room, carousel and ponzi frauds, money laundering, insider trading, bribery and corruption.

Led by Principal Solicitor Scott Ewing – long regarded as the ‘go-to’ lawyer throughout the City of London in respect of fraud allegations and regulatory advice – our lawyers have been instructed in many of the largest, most complicated fraud trials of the past 20 years.

Our team have also been involved in some of the biggest confiscation proceedings brought since the introduction of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, where their various successes have left Ewing Law in such demand that we are now often approached to privately undertake POCA proceedings, even when not instructed in the original case.

EXAMPLES OF THE CASES IN WHICH MEMBERS OF THE EWING LAW TEAM HAVE TAKEN A LEAD ROLE INCLUDE
R. v. B.
Represented the alleged controller of a large-scale ‘long firm’ fraud, where the value of the fraud was set at over £500,000. This benefit level was attributed to each defendant. Following legal argument the Defendant – despite his alleged greater role – was ordered to repay £5,000, considerably less than was ordered from each of his co-defendants.
Birmingham Crown Court
BIRMINGHAM CROWN COURT
R. v. G.
Acted for the Defendant in confiscation proceedings arising from a prosecution in which other lawyers were instructed. The Defendant had pleaded guilty to an allegation of conspiracy to import Class A Drugs, with the Crown alleging that he had benefitted to the amount of £1.5million from his involvement. Following legal argument the Defendant was made subject to a confiscation order that required him to repay £1.
Manchester Crown Court
MANCHESTER CROWN COURT
R. v. B.
Represented one of a number of Defendants following a plea to what was alleged to be the largest ‘car-ringing’ operation ever investigated in the North of England. The subsequent Proceeds of Crime Act application was – at the time – the largest of its type ever pursued. The Defendant alone was subject to an application well in excess of £1million and, after legal argument, was ultimately ordered to pay less than £8,000.
Stoke Crown Court
STOKE CROWN COURT
R. v. W.
Acted for the Defendant in confiscation proceedings arising from a prosecution in which other lawyers were instructed. Following conviction for conspiracy to supply Class A Drugs, the Crown sought to confiscate the Defendant’s assets as the proceeds of crime. This was successfully contested on the basis that the Defendant’s assets were in fact the result of his ownership of a string of highly-profitable sado-masochistic ‘dungeons’, and that these could not be seized as the proceeds of crime in the absence of a prosecution for the offence of living off of immoral earnings.
Maidstone Crown Court
MAIDSTONE CROWN COURT
R. v. WS
Acted for the Defendant in confiscation proceedings arising from a prosecution in which other lawyers were instructed. Confiscation proceedings were stayed in the Crown Court after legal argument on the basis that to proceed with them would be ‘Unfair’. The Department of Work and Pensions sought review of this decision in to the Administrative Court, where the decision of the Crown Court judge was upheld. This remains the first and only case in which an application under the Proceeds of Crime Act have been stayed on the ground that it would be ‘unfair to try’.
Croydon Crown Court / Royal Courts of Justice (Queens Bench Division)
CROYDON CROWN COURT / ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE (QUEENS BENCH DIVISION)
R. v. D.
Defended a highly successful wealth management specialist who - separate to his legitimate business - had perpetrated a ‘Ponzi fraud’ by collecting funds in excess of £14,000,000 from investors on the basis that the monies would be kept in a risk free, high-interest account from which regular interest payments would be made, but which funds were in fact used by the defendant for his personal enjoyment.
Southwark Crown Court
SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT

General Crime

In addition to a wealth of experience defending serious crime and complex fraud, the defence expertise of the Ewing Law team applies equally to cases of general crime, whether tried in the magistrates court or before a jury in the Crown Court.

Whilst legal aid is generally available for offences of this type (subject to means testing), the rates paid are very low and as such it is extremely difficult to properly prepare such a case to Ewing Law’s exacting standards, and equally difficult to find a suitably able barrister willing to act. Ewing Law will therefore only accept these cases on a private basis, to ensure that our clients are properly represented at every stage and that they enjoy the best possible defence team.

Motoring Offences

Ewing Law accepts private instruction to act on behalf of the defence in respect of any and all alleged motoring offences.

Whilst some build a brand around the concept of loophole defences, at Ewing Law we simply instruct the best, most experienced road-traffic barristers to study every case in detail and identify any technical or procedural defences which may be available. In addition, our specialists will advise fully and realistically on any factual defence advanced by our clients, and we routinely instruct experts in the field of alcoholic dissipation, GATSO (and other speed camera) calibration/accuracy and vehicle performance to challenge the prosecution case.

Those who bring allegations of road traffic violation to our team can be assured of honest, up-to-date and wholly realistic advice. If there is a factual defence with a reasonable prospect of success, we will tell you. If there is a technical or procedural point to be raised, we will advise you. But if there is no chance of success, or if our client is hoping for a ‘loophole’ which no longer exists, we will advise of this also. At Ewing Law our client is our number one priority, and we have no wish to pursue any case that is not in that client’s interest.

Regulatory Offences & Discipline

The Ewing Law team boasts considerable experience in advising and defending in a wide variety of Regulatory matters.

These have ranged from Health and Safety prosecutions to allegations of Food Standard Agency violations, and to matters brought before the General Medical Council, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, the General Dental Council and the Financial Conduct Authority.

In addition to regulatory prosecutions we have for many years represented professional sportsmen and sportswomen before the governing bodies of their chosen sport. This experience has in the main been before the Amateur Boxing Association, The British Boxing Board of Control and the Rugby Football Union and the United Kingdom Anti-Doping Panel, but has also included the Football Association.

Ewing Law has defended these matters at all levels, from the Magistrates Court through to the High Court and all the way to the Court of Appeal.

EXAMPLES OF THE CASES IN WHICH MEMBERS OF THE EWING LAW TEAM HAVE TAKEN A LEAD ROLE INCLUDE
Amateur Boxing Association v J
Acted for the defendant before the Amateur Boxing Association following the suspension of the defendant’s licence to box. The suspension came after an arrest for an allegation of drug dealing, for which Scott Ewing and Tony Wyatt acted as solicitor and barrister respectively, securing an acquittal of the charges. The application for the return of the defendant’s licence was successful, allowing him to compete in the 2012 Olympics where he won a Gold Medal before embarking on a high-profile professional career.
Re: British Meat Producers Association
Instructed by the British Meat Producers Association to advise upon the legality or otherwise of the imposition of additional value charges by the Food Standards Agency, a complex enquiry involving consideration of the direct application of European legislation and its correct interpretation.
Health & Safety Executive v K.
Acted for the Defendant company accused of having breached its health and safety obligations as a result of the death of an employee who had fallen through the panelled roof of a warehouse whilst in the process of cleaning guttering. It was alleged that proper processes had not been put in place to prevent employee’s act as the deceased had acted, whilst the Defendant company asserted that such processes were in place but had in fact been deliberately ignored/avoided by the deceased prior to his death.
KINGS LYNN CROWN COURT
Food Standards Agency v P.F.
Represented P.F. in its appeal of the Food Standards Agency’s refusal to grant P.F. – a major livestock ‘production’ facility – full approval to trade following P.F.’s alleged failure to meet the FSA conditions of licence. Following the success of P.F.’s appeal against this decision, the Food Standards Agency opted to prosecute P.F. for a series of alleged breaches of food standards regulations. These allegations became the subject of successful negotiation whereby P.F. maintained its trading rights.
COLCHESTER MAGISTRATES COURT
Food Standards Agency v F.
Acted alone on behalf of F. (a major poultry slaughterhouse) in resisting the decision of the Food Standards Agency to close its main plant following failure to achieve ‘full approval’ of its working practices. The outcome of the matter was of particular importance as success for F. would undermine the legality of the policies adopted by the Food Standards Agency. This matter was considered by the Administrative Court in 2011, at which time the approach of the Food Standards Agency to the grant of both conditional and full approval to trade was considered to be unlawful from the Agency’s inception, due to a misapplication of the legislation. ‘The Official Feed and Food Controls (England)(Amendment) Regulations 2011’ have been implemented as a result of this case.
ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE (QUEENS BENCH DIVISION)

Advisory Services

A successful business will seek legal advice before entering into a commercial arrangement or a contract of any sort in order to avoid legal dispute or difficulties at a later stage. The most successful, however, will do the same in respect of whether their proposed actions carry any technical criminal or regulatory breaches.

As a result of our many years at the very forefront of white collar criminal defence and regulatory law, the Ewing Law team are well versed in the more technical aspects of what can and cannot constitute a ‘fraud’, in both the criminal and civil sense. We are also very aware of what seemingly innocuous actions would amount to a breach of regulatory rules in, for example, the financial sector. This expertise has left us in great demand when it comes to providing pre-emptive advice to bankers, traders and entrepreneurs, to ensure that their proposed actions or business conduct is both wholly legal and within the bounds of their own regulatory rules.

Believing strongly that crime prevention is preferable criminal defence, our founder and Principal Solicitor takes the lead with the criminal and regulatory aspect of this advisory service. Over the years Scott’s advice has seen many well known institutions and individuals change their intended courses of conduct to ensure that their actions are sound from both a legally and regulatory position, saving them money and sleepless nights in the process.

Our advisory services are offered internationally.

TESTIMONIALS

Don’t just take our word for it, our clients words speak volumes.

If any client were to come to me and say that they were facing an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office or the National Crime Agency or anyone else, the first and only number I would give them would be the number for Ewing Law. There is no one better; as far as I’m concerned, they are the fourth emergency service’
KEITH BISHOP, KEITH BISHOP ASSOCIATES PR
I have represented high-profile sportsmen and women for my entire professional career. Unfortunately that high-profile can sometimes attract trouble, and when it does I always recommend Scott Ewing and his team at Ewing Law. Over the years they have represented some of the biggest names in Sport, and I have never known any lawyer than consistently performs at such a level.’
RICHARD MAYNARD, MAYNARD COMMUNICATIONS
In the security industry legal complications are inevitable, whether for our employees or for our clients. When they arise we turn to Ewing Law. There is no one better when it comes to solving a problem quickly and with the least amount of fuss.’
NOBLE SECURITY
MORE
SCAN TO CONNECT
QR code to call us
CALL US
Scan to call
0207 183 8838
QR code to email us
EMAIL US
Scan to email
enquiries@ewinglaw.co.uk
QR code for map and directions
FIND US